The Truth About the Flu Shot
It is apparently Flu shot season. Today at work they were giving out free jabs. It was terrifying the way people lined up to have a chemical substance, the contents of which they know absolutely nothing about, injected into their bodies.
Not only do these vaccines contain heavy metals, foreign DNA, and who know what else, but the entire concept behind it is based on pseudoscience, as the strand of the virus that the vaccine is supposed to protect a person from is simply guessed. Here is Robert Scott Bell expounding on this:
The evidence shows that the entire vaccination program, including childhood vaccines, is a biological warfare program aimed at the people by the governments of the world, for the purpose of dumbing them down and making them weak and infertile. It would be very difficult to assert that the individuals designing these vaccines actually believe they are helping people by injecting them with this poison, and they are familiar with the statistics that have generally shown that you are more likely to get the flu after receiving the shot. Most medical professionals are in willful denial about this, as if they accepted that the vaccines were a scam, they would then have to question the entire program of indoctrination they have been subjected to, and as we know, the vast majority of people are totally unwilling to do this.
I was going to write up an article on the topic, but have opted to instead post the full text of an excellent article by Croft Woodruff, from the April 2000 issue of Alive magazine.
–Andre
***
The Flu Vaccine Myth
Croft Woodruff
Statistically, you’d be more likely to avoid the flu if you took nothing at all. So why are we subjected to the flu vaccine media blitz each year?
In Vancouver, a BCTV reporter, commenting on the current flu epidemic that is overloading BC hospital emergency wards, claimed that of 32 people who were vaccinated, 30 caught the flu. Immediately, the news anchor intoned “It is not too late to get your flu shot. The vaccine is 70 percent effective.” [BCTV News Hour, January 11/00]
How does a 93.75 percent failure rate for the vaccine translate into a 70 percent effectiveness? Here is a vaccine with a success rate of 6.25 percent. This is an amazing under-achievement, since the average placebo response to distilled water injections is 30 percent-even to cure chronic low back pain.
How can any drug company manufacture a drug which has nearly five times less of a positive response than virtually nothing at all? How does such a questionable treatment get past federal health regulators?
According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world’s leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) her chances of getting Alzheimer’s Disease is 10 times higher than if she had one, two or no shots.
When asked why this was so, Fudenberg said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and most childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is this why the number of those suffering from Alzheimer’s is expected to quadruple?
Creating herd immunity through mass vaccinations seems to be justified in the name of sacrificing a few for the greater good of the majority. It means people are expendable. Some would call this premeditated murder. This was what the Nuremburg Trials were about after World War II.
People cannot and must not be medicated or subjected to experimentation against their will. It also flies totally in the face of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Vaccines consist of mainly three categories of ingredients. The first are cultured bacteria and viruses. The second ingredient is the medium in which they are cultivated. This may be chick embryo, chicken or duck egg protein, pig or horse blood, dog kidney tissue, monkey kidney tissue, calf serum, rabbit brain tissue, aborted human fetal cells or cowpox pus. These foreign proteins are injected directly into the bloodstream. They are not subject to the stomach’s hydrochloric acid. The enzymes of digestion are absorbed into the blood and carried directly to the liver.
Like insect stings or snake bites, these foreign proteins and other toxic byproducts have the potential for a mild to severe or fatal reaction.
Vaccines also contain stabilizers, neutralizers, carrying agents and preservatives such as formaldehyde, mercury and aluminum. As noted previously, mercury and aluminum are neurological poisons-they accumulate in the brain. Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen and is used to embalm the dead. There is no safe level of formaldehyde injected into a living organism.
Life After Vaccines
Sweden banned the pertussis vaccine in 1979, considering it both dangerous and ineffective -infant mortality dropped afterward. Sweden now maintains one of the lowest incidence of infant mortality in the world. In 1975, Japan raised the age of the pertussis vaccine to two years of age considering it a danger in infancy. Since that time, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has largely disappeared.
Nations with voluntary vaccine programs such as Canada and the United Kingdom have lower infant mortality rates than the US. Before the 1960s and the move to mandatory mass childhood vaccinations, the US had the second best infant mortality rate in the world. Forty years of mass immunizations later, with a childhood series of more than 34 vaccine mixtures prior to entering 1st grade, the US has dropped to number 24. Why does the wealthiest nation in the world, with all its vaunted health technology and medical know-how, have such a dismal record for infant mortality?
Every year in the US, 12,000 to 14,000 reports of adverse reactions associated with vaccinations-including hospitalizations, permanent brain damage and death-are reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Any drug on the market with a fraction of this record would be recalled in short order. Recent Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine campaigns in the US have coincided with a 200 per cent rise in the incidence of autism. Hepatitis B vaccine alone has been responsible for 25,000 reports of adverse reactions including optic neuritis, brain damage, paralytic polio and sudden death.
There is not an insurance underwriter who will offer liability coverage for drug companies in the event any of their vaccines cause death or disability to the recipient. One would think this should give cause to reflect on the value of official assurances of vaccine safety. Indeed, the US government assumed liability for vaccine damage because the manufacturers could not get insurance. Since 1987, over a billion US dollars have been paid out to compensate only 10 percent of the claimants.
The current effort to make vaccines compulsory world wide will be a license to print money for the vaccine producers and an iatrogenic health disaster of the first magnitude.
Health professionals and others in work situations requiring compulsory vaccines are faced with hard choices. If there is a family history of allergy or anaphylactic reaction, they may be able to apply for exemption on medical grounds. Otherwise, you take your chances with vaccine roulette.
Croft Woodruff is president (since 1991) of the EDTA Chelation Association of British Columbia.
[...] Credit [...]
[...] See the original post [...]
http://parallelnormal.com/2008/11/11/google-the-flu-the-feds-will-see-you-now/
HOLD OFF on the recommendation of the Flu Vaccine for Everyone
Flu vaccine manufactures inserts state other wise double check the facts
by Heather L. Maurer
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that children from the ages of 6 months through 18 years be vaccinated annually against the flu. They also recommend pregnant women should receive the flu vaccine. However, have you read the influenza vaccine manufacturer product inserts outlining warnings and use in specific populations?
There are important facts about influenza vaccine discussed in the vaccine manufacturers’ product inserts that you need to know before you or your child gets a flu shot.
On the FDA’s website (www.fda.gov/CBER/flu/Flu2008.htm), there is information about the 2008/2009 Season Lot release Status as of October 14, 2008 for influenza vaccines available for distribution. The specific flu vaccines they list (by trade name) are, Afluria, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluvirin and Fluzone.
FluMist, which is a live virus nasal vaccine commonly used for children because of its ease in administering, warns: “Do not administer FluMist to children less than 24 months of age because of increased risk of hospitalization and wheezing observed in clinical trials. FluMist should not be administered to any individuals with asthma or children greater than five years of age with recurrent wheezing because of the potential for increased risk of wheezing post vaccination.”
The Fluarix vaccine manufacturer product insert states, “Fluarix has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility. Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Fluarix. It is not known whether Fluarix can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Fluarix is not indicated for use in children.”
Are parents asking doctors ahead of time which flu vaccine their child is getting? Do they know if their child is at high risk for having a vaccine reaction?
In addition, how many parents and the general population know that flu vaccine carries a risk for getting the autoimmune disease Guillain-Barre Syndrome which can cause paralysis? Fluarix, states under the Warnings and Precautions, “If Guillain-Barre syndrome has occurred within six weeks of receipt of a prior influenza vaccine, the decision to give Fluarix should be based on careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks. Immunocompromised compromised persons may have a reduced immune response to Fluarix.”
What about all of the people who have autoimmune diseases including diabetes, asthma, multiple sclerosis, Epstein-Barr, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus to name a few. Are they at an increased risk for negative side effects?
The government and various pediatric associations have stated that the influenza vaccine has been proven safe and effective for children. Still, a lot of parents don’t like the idea of giving their children vaccines containing mercury. There are mercury-free influenza vaccines in single dose vials for children but parents have to make a special effort to ask pediatricians for it because mercury-free flu vaccines are in short supply. Five of the six FDA approved influenza vaccines listed on the FDA’s website contain thimerosal including, Fluarix, Afluria, Fluzone, Flulaval, and Fluvirin. The live virus FluMist is the only one that does not contain mercury but it is not recommended for children under two years of age.
According to the CDC’s website, Fluzone, Inactivated TIV, single dose pre-filled 0.25 MlSyringe or the Fluzone, Inactivated TIV, Single-dose pre-filled 0.5 mL syringe or vial doesn’t contain thimerosal preservative however the same trade name, Fluzone, Inactivated TIV multi-dose vial does contain thimerosal.
The CDC’s website also lists Fluvirin, Inactivated TIV, multi-dose vial, recommended for children four years and older which contains thimerosal as well as their single-dose pre-filled 0.5 mL syringe. The CDC states, “Preservative free (1 mcg or less mercury/0.5 ml) which indicates there is trace amount of thimerosal in the vaccine.
FluMist is the only one that doesn’t contain mercury however it is not recommended for children under two years of age and one of the side effects listed is wheezing.
In 1999 the Public Health Service, FDA, NIH, CDC and HRSA issued the following statement, “As a precautionary measure, the Public Health Service (including the FDA, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics issued two Joint Statements, urging vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal in vaccines as soon as possible (CDC 1999) and (CDC 2000).” So why are these manufactures still using thimerosal, the mercury based preservative, in vaccines? In 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that “mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children and efforts should be made to reduce exposure to the extent possible pregnant women and children as well as the general population.”
So why is mercury is still put in most influenza vaccines on the market today? Why don’t the vaccine manufacturers make ALL influenza vaccine mercury-free?
In the product manufacturer inserts for Fluarix, Fluzone, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluarix and Afluria all state in the “Use in Specific Populations section” that the safety of these vaccines have not been established for pregnant women and nursing mothers. Flurarix manufacturers insert says, “Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Fluarix. It is not known whether Fluarix can case fetal harm when administered to pregnant women or can affect reproduction capacity. Fluarix should be given to pregnant women only if clearly needed.”
Yet, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AGOG) recommend in early October 2008 that women, including those who are pregnant, get their annual influenza vaccine.
Why would any woman carrying a child put herself and her unborn child at risk by getting a vaccine the vaccine ’s manufacturer does not recommend and cannot guarantee is safe for her or her child? Where is the Hippocratic Oath to “first, do not harm” when obstetricians and pediatricians are recommending influenza vaccine for pregnant women and children?
Recent news reports have revealed that in the last few years, influenza vaccine was ineffective for most who received it because the influenza strains contains in the vaccines did not match the strains which were circulating in the U.S. In young children, effectiveness was as low as seven percent. The odds weren’t exactly in the favor of those who received it.
If the government and manufacturers fail to choose the right influenza strains again this year, then we will have once again put a boat load of money into the pockets of one of the most wealthy and powerful industries out there - the pharmaceutical industry. And we will not have factored in the potential greater long term health costs that will be paid for the damage done to the brains and immune systems of many children and adults who were encouraged and even forced to use influenza vaccine.
[...] 15, 2008 - The Truth About the Flu Shot (includes video) - Outlaw [...]
After reading through the article, I just feel that I need more information on the topic. Can you suggest some resources ?
ohh