Hey. It’s been a while.
After a few paradigm shifts, it turns out there is a lot on this site I no longer support. As such, rather than try to fix it all up, I have decided to make a new site.
Here it is:
I’ve also got a Youtube Channel and some audio recordings up. Check it out.
This site still has a forum, but as it is a total clusterfuck, I recommend you check out my new forum at forum.realitysituation.com.
One Love.
Andre.
In Which a New Idea is Presented
This “Truth Movement” has been happening for quite awhile now. Those of us who have been involved in it for a significant amount of time have seen the public awareness of factual information which has been commonly referred to as “conspiracy theory” rise exponentially. Most people you meet are aware of the questions surrounding the attacks of 9/11. Large numbers of people understand the devious nature of the banking system. Significant segments of the world population are finally becoming informed about, and in turn adopting a righteous hostility toward, the one world government system that is being rolled out by the mainstream media as the only solution to the engineered global economic collapse and the totally fabricated “climate crisis”.
The world is headed nowhere good, and a lot of people get that. But still it moves forward, and we stand helpless, stunned like deer in the headlights, incapable of reacting in any meaningful way to the certain death we appear to be facing. I believe our inability to effectively respond to this crisis is rooted in our inability to see it for what it really is. We know the details. We see what is wrong, but we don’t know how to stop it because we haven’t yet looked at what caused it, and we have yet to question the deeper meaning behind it.
In a series of articles, of which you are now reading the first, I am going to attempt to explain in the simplest terms possible what is really happening, and why it is happening, and finally the only sensible way that we can possibly respond to it. This is less a “series of articles” than it is the new theme of this webpage. I have spent more than two years now trying to come up with a way to describe the revelations that I have come to regarding the state of the Planet Earth, and I have decided that I must simply tell it how it is, as best I can, and let you all do with it what you will.
We need a new paradigm. Mine is a rather straightforward one, when compared to those offered by the moguls of this so-called movement. I have immersed myself in the available information regarding the world system for a long time. I have been all the way around the problem, looked at it all from every angle, and I honestly believe there is only one conclusion that a person looking at this thing with pure honesty can draw. My hope is that the brighter ones among you will take what I am presenting and run with it.
What I have determined is that civilization as a whole was a scam from the beginning, and the only logical path for humanity to take is to utterly abandon it and return to a hunter/gatherer lifestyle. Ultimately, this is going to happen whether you want it to or not, as there is no other way it can go, but if you understand that it will happen, and why it must happen, you are going to be psychologically, and perhaps even physically, prepared for the total collapse of the entirety of world civilization. At the very least, you are going to be able to quit wasting your time running around talking about Ron Paul and building 7.
So let us begin. In the following paragraphs I will lay out the basic concepts which I will proceed to elaborate on in future essays.
The Future as They See It
A person who is moderately educated in world happenings can see pretty clearly what the future holds, if he wants to. Most people don’t want to. Let’s run through a quick review of the not-so-distant future, as envisioned by the ruling elite.
The once sovereign nations of the planet are very rapidly being brought under the umbrella of a system of “global governance”. This is very public nowadays, with Obama figure-heading the recent G-20 summit where it was declared that we need a “New World Order” where a “world authority” will regulate the “globalized economy”. For those who don’t know, the economic system of any country is the basis for its government; so this was a hardly veiled declaration by all of the world’s power entities that they are now taking steps to solidify a system of global government. The plan is to set up the United Nations as a global authority under which the individual nations are simply “states”, the laws and practices of which are dictated to by the top. But you already knew that.
It does not take an MIT statistician to determine that this system of global government will follow the same trend that all of the governments which are coming together to form it have been following. Personal freedom will continue to deteriorate while those in power continue to make more and more of our decisions for us. The gap between the rich and the poor will continue to widen. The education system will continue to step up the intensity of the bizarre indoctrination our children are undergoing. We will keep fighting Muslims in the name of an elusive concept called “democracy”. We will keep drinking fluoridated water and eating genetically modified food. Political correctness will be enforced more and more aggressively. We will still be inundated with ubiquitous microwave radiation from cell phone towers and wi-fi antennas. And the masses will still be watching TV and letting the experts do the thinking.
The United Nations has stated on more than one occasion that China is the model state for the world. So expect it to just keep getting slowly worse, until you find yourself being pulled out of your apartment and tortured in a van because you looked at something you weren’t supposed to on the Internet. Or you get put into a prison where you will wait for your organs to be harvested and sold to some rich technocrat because it was found that you were taking part in religious practices not condoned by the state. Or your wife gets dragged off to have a forced abortion preformed on her because you didn’t pull out in time.
Meanwhile, as the governments of the world move swiftly to set up an Orwellian nightmare society in the name of security and saving mother Gaia, parallel developments taking place in the world of science and technology are mind-bendingly insane. This side of the equation is not being broadcast as loudly, but the information is all there, for those with the desire to look it up. Science magazines and websites are reporting daily on developments in nanotechnology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering and brain-computer interface technology.
This certainly might sound a bit far-fetched to those living in the mundane world of television fantasy, but it is all there for anyone interested to see. Ray Kurzweil, the 62-year-old head of Singularity University, a joint venture between Google and NASA, believes that technology is progressing at such a rate that he will be able to extend his life indefinitely. Active denial systems are capable of subduing entire cities with the use of a single soldier. Paraplegics with wires plugged into their brains are operating machines and surfing the Internet with their thoughts. Scientists have been mixing and matching genes of animals and plants to create new species for over half a decade now; it was recently announced that the glowing green monkeys are able to have baby glowing green monkeys. This is all happening now. We are living in a science fiction nightmare.
So when you combine the emerging totalitarian world state with these emerging technologies which have an incalculable risk of abuse, what we end up with is a hell on earth. Humanity as we have known it is going to cease to exist as we move into the post-human era. Every trait by which we have defined our humanness will be lost in the whirlwind of progress. The existing populations we be utterly subdued through electronic means as the ruling elite, at last capable of attaining eternal life, begin production of new types of genetically engineered slaves to serve in their everlasting kingdom.
This is the plan as it stands.
Can We Save Our Society?
The popular rhetoric spewed by all of the so-called leaders of the Truth Movement focuses on targeting the people in power, claiming that if we are able to somehow remove them from power, we have solved our problem. What I am arguing is that the people in power are interchangeable, and simply mechanisms by which a very old process is reaching the stage of fruition. We are rapidly approaching the end of a very long cycle.
These official talkers, on the Patriot stations and websites, typically talk about Jews and Masons and whatever else, and how they have hijacked our system, and if we can simply take it back though some unexplainable means, and transfer power over to Ron Paul or whoever else, we can use new technologies for good and establish a paradise on earth. Let me state clearly that I am not claiming these people in power are not responsible for their actions. I am simply saying that if they were not there, others would be. They are playing a role.
Take a brief look at the history of “civilization” and what you see is an virtually unbroken line of slavery and oppression. There are almost no examples of governments that were not oppressive. From Sumer, Egypt, and Rome, to European feudalism, and up through modern day capitalist and communist systems, there is always a small elite ruling over a mass of peasants. As everything about our society changes, this remains a constant. This is the simple fact of the matter. What we are seeing now with the encroachment of this scientific dictatorship is merely the logical conclusion to the process of what is commonly referred to as “progress”.
Civilization is based upon the centralization of a power structure over vast numbers of people. Centralized power necessitates centralized leadership and control. Whenever you have this, you are going to have a situation where very intelligent people who desire to be in control are able to attain these positions. These people are psychopaths. That is the personality type that seeks power over other people. Normal people don’t have this desire, and will generally even feel uncomfortable with the idea of holding such positions. Again, history bares witness. As technology advances, power becomes further centralized, with the ruling forces able to exercise control over finer and finer details of our lives.
Many seem to have the idea that technology, and societal “progress”, will ultimately result in our freedom as a species. The popular propaganda film Zeitgeist: Addendum is a prime example of this ideology. Believing that this system, which has always been rooted in slavery, and used every new advancement in science to further exploit and abuse the huddled masses, will somehow eventually lead to freedom after progressing to a certain point is equivalent to a girl who is repeatedly sexually abused by her step-father believing that eventually, if he just keeps raping her in more and more perverse ways, it will eventually lead to a meaningful and loving relationship. It is pathological.
And what if we did put Ron Paul (or some like minded populist) in charge? Never mind the fact that this is impossible, given the state of the popular media, which ultimately makes people’s choices for them. Let’s say it happened, and by some inexplicable miracle, the real powers behind the throne did not have him assassinated. For starters, in this globalized world of free trade, where slaves in China can make everything for cheaper than people in the first world where people are accustomed to a semi-decent standard of living, his free market capitalism would be utterly useless in stemming the collapsing markets of the United States, as it is no longer viable for corporations to produce anything here. As a matter of fact, given globalization, and the fact that technology has made the world a very small place, independent nations are themselves no longer viable. It just doesn’t make sense. The people talking about Ron Paul saving us are trying to bring back a system of doing things that simply cannot work in this new age of ours.
In the fantasy world where getting a populist leader into power were possible, there is also no way to stop the progress of technology, which is more and more removing human autonomy. You could attempt to outlaw the implantation of computer chips into people’s brains, but the fact of the matter is that people are going to demand that computer chips be put in their brains, so they can take part in the virtual reality video games and pornography. The companies producing these chips are inevitably going to be taking liberties with people’s brains, reviewing their thoughts and marketing specific products to them based on what they find, for instance. Then it would move quickly into the government demanding access to people’s thoughts in order to determine who is likely to be a threat to society, and ultimately collaborating with the companies in using the implant technologies to alter the brain patterns of users in order to keep them in line. This would be logical for any leader who wanted to eliminate social ills.
The same goes for genetic engineering; if you can remove the genes that make someone liable to get cancer, why not start breeding people who don’t get cancer? And from there we logically must ask, if we are able, why not make people stronger, smarter and better looking? And then it quickly moves to, why not make people genetically prone to docility and obedience, if we can prevent violence, rape, and murder?
The life extension technology brings up a similar ethical conundrum. If we are able to extend people’s lives significantly, and perhaps indefinitely, we are going to end up with way too many people on this planet. The government, even a benevolent one, would be forced to implement breeding laws, with forced abortions and sterilization, in order to avert a crisis.
So even for leaders with good intentions, the apparently logical and responsible uses of these technologies would lead to a world of mindless slaves, automatons not really even existing at all, living in a totally controlled environment. And the people in charge do not have such intentions.
Where Do We Go Now?
What I am ultimately saying here is that a civilization run by a government has never worked, and it never will. Institutions of power will always end up corrupt, and technology will always end up being used by those corrupt institutions for their own ends. Luckily, the cycle of oppression and degradation is coming to a close, as this system will soon implode in on itself. Humanity approaches a new dawn. Sadly, everyone has become addicted to the conveniences of modern living; it is very difficult for anyone to even imagine giving them up, and so the end of the scientific era is going to result in the deaths of most of the people on the planet.
The pertinent question here is: how exactly has technological society improved the quality of our lives? Even the most ardent supporters of “progress” have a very difficult time answering this question. People will eventually give improvements in health care as a definite benefit of the scientific age, as this is really the only one which even appears to make sense. However, other than the infant mortality rate (which is something I plan to examine in detail in a future essay), I think it is hard to argue our health has improved at all, even with the abundance of futuristic medical technology. Virtually everything in our environment contains toxic chemicals; our bodies are infested with them. We are inundated with electromagnetic radiation. The food we eat is for the most part poisonous. Our water is filled with drugs, fluoride and poison. People lived better and often longer before any of this technology existed (the statistics for the average lifespans of pre-civilized people factor in infant deaths; these folks often lived to be 100).
When we then examine the positives of tribal living, it becomes clear that as far as quality of life, there really is no comparison at all. For instance, cutting out “work”, which I find to be an utterly horrid concept, would make my life exponentially better. To this people will often respond with claims that tribal people did work, and some will even claim they worked harder than us, which is a nonsensical statement. The “work” that pre-civilized people did was solely related to providing for basic survival needs; no one was making a profit off of them. Picture a tribe who’s main source of food is fish. Their “work” then consists of: fishing. That is it. The women would be responsible for making whatever clothing was needed, which in warmer climates, where people generally lived, was minimal, and sometimes people simply went nude (the profound psychological and spiritual implications of nudity among tribal people will be examined in depth in the near future). Possibly people would stitch together tents, or build huts of some type (if they didn’t live in caves), but this was not something that had to be done very often. I would imagine all of these activities were rather enjoyable, and as such they can be in no way compared to the wage slavery of modern man. Another example to cite is the buffalo hunters of the American planes. The buffalo were an abundant food source, and very easy to kill. These people lived bountiful lives.
Cutting out work, one has time to spend with ones family and tribesmen, having fun, telling stories, making music, creating art, dancing, making love to the wife, joking with the old folks and generally living it up. People lived at peace with God and nature, and where we, in the age of discontent, have holes in our hearts and a yearning for something real, they had peace. Their lives were the diametric opposite of our own.
Thankfully, like the days and the seasons, the ages of man are cyclic, and this too will pass. As I have said, there is nothing else that can happen. The universe has a way of balancing itself out. The choice we face is whether we want to accept this inevitability, and do what we can to secure a future for ourselves and our progeny, or simply die with the masses. The first and biggest step in the process of saving oneself is to recognize and accept the reality of our situation. Most will not, and a lot will become angry at the mere suggestion; but everyone has a choice.
I hope I’ve succeeded here in presenting a basic outline of the direction that I believe the Truth Movement needs to be moving in. I know I am throwing out a lot of different concepts here, all the while trying to keep it as succinct as possible, but bare with me. In the future I am going to be elaborating on all of this, looking in depth at the nature of civilization and the roots of the concept of “progress” and it’s effects on human beings, as well as drawing comparisons between modern living and tribal society and examining how best one can go about living within this scientific dictatorship and maintain some level of personal autonomy, while preparing to deal with its eventual end.
I know that every one of you is confused by everything that is happening, and I know that all of the talkers who have been posted up as our leaders only make you more confused. What I am offering is a different way to look at our own existence, a new paradigm in which everything makes sense. What is happening is happening because we have abandoned our own human nature and gotten lost in an artificial world that is incapable of providing us with the meaning our souls long for. Civilizations have come and gone for millions of years. The ancients have told the tale of global empires which risen and fallen, and this too will pass. As the world burns around us, we stand at the edge of something marvelous.
Stay Free
–Andre
Below is a response I gave to a fellow on my forum evangelizing for the perspective of an individual called Prothink, who presents a worldview in which all of the evils in the world can be explained through understanding that Khazarians, who claim to be Jews but aren’t really, run the whole world.
This is the second such response to “the Jewish Question” I have posted here. The first is here.
Let me say that this is not an attack on all of those who identify themselves as “anti-Zionist”, as I consider many of them allies. It is a specific response to what was being presented on the Outlaw Forum by a poster named Alex, in a thread he created called “The Jewish Question”.
This appears to be a wildly popular topic, so I thought it worthwhile to put my comments on it up here where everyone can see them. As always, I encourage you to post your own comments below.
–Andre
***
Alex,
For several years I felt similar to you, as I’m sure many people can recall. Although I was never so obsessed with race, focusing rather on the belief system of the Jews, I felt that they were solely responsible for the present global turmoil. My thinking evolved beyond this as I gathered further information. Having you come here and tell me I am wrong, saying I am falling for propaganda, and presenting the skewed perspective of a sub-literate who is calling for a shooting war with the government as the ultimate truth, makes me feel a bit as if I am Francesco Redi, and a disgruntled townsperson is trying to convince me of the Christian merits of abiogenesis. It is tiring, so I have let this thread go without giving my input.
However, I suppose that as the Executive Officer of this ship, I am expected to comment when a thread get this long. I feel I have made my position on this issue rather plain, but it never hurts to restate these things.
This is a rather complicated issue, which I by no means have the time to fully elaborate on, but I believe I can adequately demonstrate the ridiculousness of your presentation with relatively few words.
Firstly, I do not disagree that Judaism is evil. I am opposed to the state of Israel, the banking system, and all other branches of Jewish run business. Unlike you (who are simply parroting the presentation of “Prothink”), I am also totally opposed to the Jewish religion. However, also unlike those promoting the concept of a wholly Jewish conspiracy, I do not believe that Jews are responsible for the entirety of the present global situation, nor do I believe that it could be solved in whole be the dethroning of powerful Jews, nor by disbanding AIPAC and “getting back our constitution”. I believe that Judaism, though a problem in itself, is simply a symptom of the actual problem, which is the ideology of elitism which ruled the world long before Judaism ever existed.
Most of the information presented here is solid. The Jews have been responsible for many a horror. The problem is the somewhat religious cosmology that those people whom you are parroting have developed around these facts. This perspective that everything in the world’s history can be traced back to the Jews is almost an obsessive sexual fixation. Because this “theory” is unable to explain the complexity of the world situation, those promoting it must deny entire parts of history, and make out that our situation is “not really that bad” because they cannot explain certain aspects of what is happening with “it’s the Jews”, and thus must deny key aspects of what is happening, or claim that it is coincidence.
In other word, whereas the “theories” about Jesuit control are totally groundless, containing virtually no factual information at all, Jewish Conspiracy cosmology is pretty well wholly reliant on factual information, and simply draws erroneous conclusions from these facts. This perspective appeals to several types of individuals, but for the most part, it is people who are seeking a simple solution to an extremely complex problem, either because they are by nature simple-minded people, or more often, because the situation we are facing is so overwhelming that it is too much for most people to completely grasp.
The first and most obvious fallacy contained in the “it’s the Jews” argument is the obsessively chanted catch-phrase “these people are not real Jews”. This line of thinking is based on the fact that the controlling Jewish forces are not racially Semitic, but rather Khazarian in origin. This leads people into an obsession over the racial origins of the Jewish powers, the relevance of which is never precisely explained. The fact is that the occult doctrine of elitism, prescribed in the Talmud, the Mishna, the Kaballah, and the Torah, which these people follow was laid out by people who were “real Jews”. This would lead one to believe that this is in actually an ideological problem, and not something to do with “evil genes”, as believers in the conspiracy as laid out by many of the leading “anti-Zionists” will typically conclude.
The only justification for the obsession with the racial origins of the Jewish elite appears to come from the Christian concept of a chosen race. Only if there is a chosen “Jewish race”, who actually deserve to rule over the other races of the earth, is it relevant that a separate ethnic group has dethroned the original “chosen ones” and taken on the title for themselves. If one believes that all humans are created equal, and that there is no race more blessed by God than any other, than it is irrelevant whence from those claiming supremacy originate. This confusion appears to have developed through a process wherein those who have decided to be “against the Jews” have indiscriminately incorporated many different “anti-Jewish” sources into their theology, including those Christian sources who believe in a “chosen race”. This creates a hideous double-think, in which the people fancying themselves an opposition to the “Jews” are saying both that “the Talmud says Jesus is in hell boiling in feces and condones pedophilia” and that the people who wrote the Talmud, the “real Jews”, are really good people who have fallen victim to Khazarian usurpers, who are the actual stated enemy.
The other place where this question of racial origins is particularly relevant is when discussing the State of Israel’s infamous “right to exist”. Yes, it is certainly absurd that these people are claiming a right to the land based on ancestral heritage, when in fact their ancestors never resided there. I believe in this debate in particular, the question of ethnicity has a place. However, even if the ancestors of the “Jews” were from that particular locale, this would not provide a justification for the existence of Israel, so there is not really a reason that the debate should even reach the stage of discussing the racial issue.
There are many researchers into the “Jewish question”, such as A. Michael Hoffman, who do focus their criticism on the religion itself, rather than a specific racial group who follows it, but it seems that their voices have been drowned out by those wishing to scapegoat a racial group. There is a base tribal instinct that craves this sort of childlike simplicity.
Once again, my position on the issue is that the Jewish religion itself is evil, and that all those following it, at least in it’s esoteric, elitist form, are a threat to the whole of any society in which they wield power, regardless of their specific ancestry.
The last aspect of the “Jewish race” argument I will mention is that it is in part applied to deal with the fact that many of the powerful Jews are “atheist”, and yet still claim to be a part of a “Jewish race”, even though they are not Semitic. This is partially due to the fact that one can be considered to be a Jew by other Jews without believing in a god. It is also due to the Jews’ own somewhat recently developed belief that they are a “race”. Generally, those who are raised Jewish and stop believing in the religious aspect still retain the corrupt ideology of elitism contained in the Jewish religious doctrine. It is also worth noting that most religious Jews do not believe in a god in the sense that Christians and Muslims do. Judaism, developed from the ancient Mystery religion, is more of a form of self-worship, like other forms of illuminism.
The second major issue with the theology which claims that Jews are responsible for all of the wrong in the world is that it ignores all of history. For instance, these people claim that when the Jews took over the banking system in Europe, the people became enslaved to them. This is partially true, as we are all presently slaves to an almost exclusively Jewish-run monetary system, but it is not as if everyone’s life was great before this. In fact, before wage-slavery, there was indentured servitude. This was simply slavery. Under feudalism, when the people in control were not the least bit Jewish, people were bought and sold with the land, and had absolutely no conception of “rights”. The standard of living for the average human has increased drastically in Europe since “the Jews took over”, if that is indeed what happened.
We see the same story in Russia. The people promoting a wholly Jewish conspiracy point out correctly that the Bolshevik Revolution was put on by foreign, Jewish powers, yet fail to mention that things were just as oppressive, if not worse, under the rule of the Czarist regime.
The fact is that throughout all of recorded history, wherever the structure permitted the existence of a centralized control mechanism, there has remained a minority of the human population which seizes control over society. All of the “great” civilizations, from Babylon, Sumer, Egypt and Rome up through the modern era have consisted on a tiny elite minority ruling over a mass of slaves. The details vary, but it always amounts to the same thing.
Yes, the majority of ruling forces in the Western World are directly connected to Judaism, through the monetary system. This is a fact. But this is only relevant insofar as we understand that Judaism is a religion developed from an ideology, and that this ideology, that of elitism, is the real enemy. This is the ideology contained within the ancient Mysteries, from which both Judaism and Masonry developed. It is the belief that certain people, being “better” or “more fit”, have a right to exercise their will over others.
For the record, the Catholic Church also shared a variant of this theology, luckily they are an institution almost completely without power at this point in history.
This is all part of a very ancient plan. Judaism is the new face of something much older, and they still retain all of their old allies within Freemasonry and within the non-Jewish aristocracies of every country, with which they are almost totally interbred. For the record, what is loosely referred to as “Freemasonry” encompasses not only the entirety of the Jewish elite, but also the elite of every other nationality, including those Asian countries where Jews do not have influence. It is spread throughout all aspects of politics and business, as well as the sciences and institutions of education, and the organizations which on the surface appear to be opposed to the Jews, such as the United Nations.
Another issue I take with many of those promoting a wholly Jewish conspiracy is that they repeatedly assert, as you have in this thread, that ruling elite “don’t have that much power”. I find this to be laughable. If we look around us, we see an entirely controlled world, where the people no longer retain even retain control over their own thoughts, let alone the direction of their lives, and the actual rulers have the ability to do anything they wish. I believe that when one takes it that those who are put on TV and presented as our masters, the Jewish banking cartel, are the top of the pyramid and the sole controlling force on the planet, he is going to inevitably underestimate the degree to which the world is controlled. They have a very narrow perspective, given that they dismiss anything that does not relate directly to something Jewish as being irrelevant. The real powers do not appear on TV, and you do not know their names. It’s called a “cryptocracy”.
These people also tend to put way too much weight in the way the media presents events, and distort seemingly unrelated issues to fit their theology. I know that most of the “anti-Zionists” were claiming that Putin was a hero, fighting the Jewish enemy, before he installed a Jewish president over Russia. They also have claimed that China is an independent force, apparently supposing that it must be because it has no visible Jewish leaders. They claim that it is offering a genuine opposition to the US, whereas I would assert that this is merely obvious media hysterics. They are unable to explain why the US would transfer all of it’s industry to China if it was not completely under the control of the same ruling global forces, nor are they able to explain how the US would be able to fight a war with China, given that we are totally dependent on them for virtually the entirety of our economy.
So, is Judaism evil? Yes. Should we oppose it? Of course. Will “defeating” Judaism solve all of the world’s problems? Not by a long shot. We must strike at the root if we wish to present a true opposition to the hell that is being created on this planet, and the root is the simple concept that certain people have a right to rule over others. This is the true enemy. Until the masses are capable of widening their gaze and grasping the whole of this situation, we are simply going to be running around in circles, fueled by petty ego, arguing with one another over trivialities until it’s too late to do anything at all.
Some Further Criticism
You are of course supporting Prothink, parroting his sloppy presentation word-for-word. As people know, I have taken issue with him in the past, specifically when he began telling people to start a war with the government and was advertising a compound he was building in which he was planning to stockpile weapons in preparation for said war with the government. He was also quite vocal in calling for all Jews to be placed in internment camps, as well as for mass executions. After calling for a debate with me, I accepted, and he then said he didn’t actually want to do it.
I watched one of his videos, where he was citing books, and then saying “I haven’t actually read it, but I have heard about what’s in it”. He later admitted that he does not read books, and has gotten his entire body of knowledge from internet documentaries. I believe that he is actually suffering from some form of mental retardation, though he may simply have grown up watching too much television, severely stunting his brain development. He is like a child.
I understand the concept of confronting the message rather than the messenger, which is why I did so above before mentioning this, but just as with the Jews, a person’s actions are representative of their personal belief system and understanding of the world around them, and it just seems terribly unlikely that a man who doesn’t even read, and is calling for a shooting war with the government, is the man that has all of the answers.
There are many other gaping holes in the theology of persons such as Prothink, as you’ve relayed it to us here. It is a belief system which, though containing a lot of truth, is a long way from explaining the depth of what is happening in the world, or what can be done about it.
From childhood, citizens of Western countries are taught to have a religious sort of reverence for the concept of “Democracy”. Though the meaning of this word changes with some regularity, it is generally taken to mean a system of government where the people, at least the majority, decide the way things are done.
When people begin to wake up to the reality of what is taking place in the world today, they are gripped by an urgent need to take some sort of action to counteract what is happening; their first response is usually to seek some type of political solution. They are then pushed further into the mindset that positive change can be achieved through political means by the segments of the alternative media which I believe can properly be termed “controlled opposition”; because as long as a person believes that they can “use the system to fight the system”, they remain completely harmless, presenting absolutely no threat to the real institutions of power.
The entire concept of “Democracy” was created and given to us by the ruling elite. They understood that in an age when the power of the religious institutions, which had for millennia taught us that it was God’s will that we obey our rulers, began to wane, they would need a new technique for keeping the masses in-line. Instilling people with the belief that they had a say in the way the rulers ruled them would keep them from launching violent revolutions, or for that matter, doing anything at all to question the status quo. This technique has worked marvelously.
The “political theater” is nothing more than a drama presented for public consumption. Real decisions are not made by politicians, but by think-tanks and councils such as the CFR, always based on the mandates of the United Nations. This should be obvious enough, given that no matter what kind of rhetoric the politicians are spouting, the same agenda pushes forward, unhindered.
The now historical “Great Ron Paul Debacle” should be proof enough for anyone that we are wasting our time even thinking about politics at all. Millions of man-hours were wasted attempting to do the impossible. This is time which could have been spent informing people about real issues. I think everyone would do well to get a little irked at the so-called “leaders” who pushed so many of us into believing we were actually going to win this election. They all knew better (at least most of them did).
I had hoped that this monumental failure would have been enough to jolt people back into reality and get this entire movement to recognize the plain fact that we are not going to save the world with politics. To my astonishment, I am still seeing Truth related websites encouraging people to “call their congressmen”; some are even promoting “Ron Paul 2012”.
Although I too would love to believe that we could simply all go vote for a Ron Paul or a Ralph Nader, and instantly fix all of the world’s problems, this simply is not an option. This is a broken paradigm, and it’s now time to move on.
The first thing to understand is that the mass media controls virtually every aspect of Western society, and thus determines the outcome of elections. Neither the television, nor the AM radio is ever going to present an alternative candidate as a viable option.
Though Ron Paul had a great deal of support among the educated segments of the population and was even given a surprising amount of face-time by the MSM, he was ridiculed and declared a joke by all of the pundits, and thus the mass man was convinced that even if they sympathized with his positions, it would be a waste of time to support him, and so they moved on to more “realistic” options.
The second major reason why there can never be a political solution to the problems we face is that if a politician who genuinely wished to do right by the people were ever elected to a significant position of power, he would either be turned, or assassinated. We saw with President John F. Kennedy, and more recently with Senator Paul Wellstone that the real rulers of the world have no problem assassinating American politicians who refuse to play ball.
Another somewhat secondary point is that no matter who the people vote for, the establishment will put whoever they want in office. George Bush actually lost two elections. Even though Gore and Kerry were both shill candidates who would not have done anything differently, the powers that be had their minds set on Bush, and simply allowed him to steal two consecutive elections.
It is also worth noting that with the new Diebold voting machines, voter fraud has become much less messy. This is largely unnecessary, but provides a failsafe if a real candidate somehow makes it to the final running.
If politics won’t work, then what are we supposed to do?
The main reason that people seem unwilling to abandon their faith in the political system is that they feel that if they do, they will be left helpless, without a medium through which to act. If there isn’t a political solution, and attempting a violent revolution would only make things worse, than what are we to do? There is no easy solution, but giving up the absurd practice of wasting time doing things that we know have no chance of working is a good start.
The global agenda is presently at such an advanced stage that it is unrealistic to suppose that we are going to stop it dead in it’s tracks at this point. Things are most certainly going to get a whole lot worse before they get better. I do not believe we can “save America”, as, to put it bluntly, there is nothing left to save. This thing is going to come crashing down in an exceedingly bloody fashion, and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it.
So, on an individual level, the most important thing to do right now is prepare for what’s coming. There is no good reason anyone should still be living in a big city. Even if you have to make drastic cuts in your quality of living, it is imperative that you find a place outside of the major population centers. If at all possible, I recommend people leave the United States entirely (Europe is going to get bad as well, but nothing on the scale of the US). A remote third world country would be ideal, the less developed the better.
Wherever you are, be ready for very rough times. This includes stocking up on storable food, as well as learning to grow your own food. I also think everyone needs to learn basic survival skills, including hunting and foraging. If you have vacation time, or are out of work, go camping. You’ll learn things quickly, and I guarantee if you give it a couple days, you’ll enjoy it. Bring a book about edible plants and try and find some.
As a movement, we need to continue to focus on waking others up. We have made great strides in this endeavor since the towers came down, and we must remain vigilant. As I have said many times before, it is time to take things to the next level, and begin to create a real understanding amongst the public that our entire way of life is unsustainable, and a totally new system is necessary.
When all is said and done, this plan for a New World Order will fail. That is the only possible outcome. If the universe were going to allow such a system to exist, it would have been created a long time ago. When it fails however, our entire society is going to collapse completely. The scientific age will end. There is no way to save it; it is corrupt from the top down. Most people, even those who are partially “awake”, have become accustomed to this mode of living, and refuse to acknowledge it’s inevitable end. Regrettably, if they are unable to accept the coming changes, they will go the way of the masses.
What we are looking at is a future lifestyle more akin to that of the American Indians than that which is portrayed in science fiction. We must prepare ourselves, physically and spiritually, for a new mode of existence. The Dawn of a Beautiful New Day comes quickly upon us.
Stay Free.
–Andre
——————–
Andre lives on a farm in Ohio. He has never voted and he never will.
***
Related:
Barack Obama is the Black George Bush
Rather that reiterate what so many others have already written about the Genocide in Gaza, I would like to look at the bizarre support of this slaughter, coming mainly from the United States, without which none of this could be happening. I believe that this latest slaughter signals the final death throes of America. This failed nation no longer has an excuse to exist.
For the purpose of this article, I will look at the way the American public is responding to the information as it is presented by the media, and the moral judgment calls they are making based on this information, rather than condemning them for being altogether too stupid to figure out what is actually happening.
The American public has supported the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they are now supporting the slaughter in Palestine.
Though comparable, the genocide presently taking place in Gaza is different than that in Iraq and Afghanistan, at least in it’s presentation. Iraq and Afghanistan are presented as wars. Though a million plus Muslims have died, compared to a few thousand Americans, there is at least the impression that these people have the capability to defend themselves. In Gaza, on the other hand, the situation cannot be construed as anything other than what it is: the wholesale mass murder of a civilian population. There is also the fact that no one is even claiming that Gaza has anything to do with the United States, as they do with Iraq and Afghanistan.
Following this, I would argue that in supporting the genocide in Gaza, Americans have crossed into a completely new realm of evil. There is no going back. It is our tax dollars that have paid for the Israeli Genocide Machine, and our consent which has allowed it to press forward, and thus the blood is on our hands.
The main reason given, by the people I have talked to, for supporting this mass slaughter, is that 9 people have been killed by Hamas rockets in the last 4 years and that Israel “had to do something about that”. Though the facts about the concentration camp conditions in Gaza are being reported by the Mainstream Media, this is tossed aside. These people are driven now not by reason, but by an unholy bloodlust, that I myself see all around me, but am yet to fully comprehend.
Much of this support comes from the “Christian Right”, who believe that if they can kill enough Muslims to start a Third World War, Jesus will come down and “rapture” them up to Heaven, where they will live forever in perfect health. Slaughter in the name of God is the highest of evils, and these people all have a special place waiting for them in the Ninth Circle. Many atheists side with Israel, as they see her as a force of Natural Selection, wiping the earth clean of a lesser evolved species. The others supporting the genocide don’t seem to have any reason at all, other than that they hate Muslims, and think the world would be better off without them. This idea that Muslims are a problem needing solved has been drilled into their heads by mass media and mass entertainment for so many years that it has become an unquestioned part of their manufactured reality. They are too weak minded to question even the most basic aspects of their indoctrination that effect their everyday lives, so we can’t expect them to be able to question the stated logic behind events taking place halfway around the world.
A once proud people have become a nation of monsters, crying out for the blood of children. The American conscience is dead. We have buried it like a cheap hooker in a shallow grave in a desert somewhere. Our fate is sealed.
This is why America deserves the hell that awaits it. She is beyond redemption. She has become the most powerful force for evil that the world has ever seen.
So yes, the economy is going to collapse. Martial law will be declared. Plagues will be released. Foreign troops will be brought in to usher us onto trains bound for containment camps. People will eat their own children. And it will be sad. I will cry. But it will be justice, long awaited. A people cannot condemn innocents to death forever without it coming back on them. God and the Universe demand a balance. Blood for blood.
Realize this when it all comes down. Realize that it is simple cause and effect. And know that if you have remained vigilant, and stood against this beast, than fate will be much kinder to you than to those who have bathed in the blood of innocents.
Stay Free
–Andre
I appeared on a broadcast of The Information Underground this morning.
Ognir and I discussed a broad range of issues, from the recent threats being launched against me by Alan Watt and Craig Oxley, to the situation in Gaza, the all encompassing propaganda grid, the history of Christianity, the global economic collapse, Somalian Pirates, and a whole lot more.
The show is posted on Ognir’s forum here, or you can download the .mp3 directly here.
Psychopathic RBN Host Threatens to Send the Cops After Anyone who Questions Him
 |
|
The cover of a 1998 issue of the Kealey Paper, alongside a page from Alan Watt’s book. Click to enlarge.
For several months Alan Watt has been making threats against members of my forum, and on January 6th, he named me personally, and said he would be sending the cops after me. He has continually lied and distorted reality, and after recently having been exposed for plagiarizing the work of a man named Glen Kealey, he is reaching into new depths of bizarre desperation, claiming that I am the leader of a mob that is threatening his life and that of his dog, and that the cops are coming for me. It is time I told my side of this story.
***
I have been a part of the Truth Movement for going on six years. I have spent an incredible amount of time listening to radio shows and reading websites, checking out all of the different “leaders” of the movement. Eventually, I began to feel as if all of these people were mixing fact with fiction and simply going around in circles, without getting to the real heart of the matter, or offering any type of solutions to the incredible problems our species is facing.
A couple years ago, I discovered Alan Watt. I found that he was delving much deeper into the true history and nature of this conspiracy than all of the rest of the industry moguls. He seemed to make things exciting again, referring me to books and areas of research that I had hitherto been unaware of. At that time he was not yet on RBN, and had the feel of a genuine truth teller, with a level of integrity uncommon in this business. I particularly enjoyed the old recordings of the shows he had done with Jackie Patru. He appeared to be going after the straight truth, without falling into the traps that the rest of the individuals discussing these subjects seem to inevitably get caught in. He presented himself as a rebel, living in the woods like a hermit on very modest means, simply trying to get the word out, to give humanity one last chance to save itself before it was to late. I believed it.
He seemed to be speaking directly to me, saying everything I had always known in my gut to be true. He said that this entire system that we call “civilization” is a scam, run by psychopathic elite occultists. He talked about the true nature of man, and that every aspect of it is exploited by this system in a scientific fashion.
When I decided to put a forum on my site, people who listened to Alan began to quickly gather at newly created Outlaw Forum to discuss the various subjects and ideas presented on Alan’s show. It soon became clear that Alan was not happy about this at all. At first he made vague references to forums in general, discouraging people from visiting them at all, claiming that they were all run by government agents for the purpose of spreading disinformation. He slowly stepped up his attacks, narrowing in on Outlaw Forum, without ever naming it outright. These attacks soon became threats.
I can now see that Watt was, from the beginning, afraid that if listeners of his show were to get together and discuss his work, he would lose his control over them. They would begin to ask each other questions which Alan did not want asked, and eventually they would dig up his secrets and lies, and put them up for all the world to see.
Over the last few months, while attempting to stifle the free communication between his listeners, Alan has exposed his true self, and the little voice in the back of my head telling me that Alan was not what he claimed slowly began to rise in pitch. It was already screaming on the night of January 6th, when Alan Watt identified me by name on his RBN broadcast, and told me that the cops would be coming for me because I had dared to question his authenticity.
“I am Perfectly Genuine, I Assure You”
Certain things about Alan have always made me uncomfortable. For one, he is probably one of the most negative people I have ever been exposed to. He directly implies that everything is fake and evil, and he paints the picture that we have absolutely no chance of overcoming this horror that is upon us, and that there really isn’t anything about humanity worth saving anyway. I understand that things are nearly as bad as he implies, at least in the Western World, but my personal belief is that we as humans exist for a reason, and that we are experiencing this evil for a reason. I believe there is meaning in our suffering, and meaning in the struggle to overcome evil. God or the Universe would not allow us to be born into such a situation as this, without giving us a shot at redemption. He always seemed to leave this bit out of his presentation.
Tying into this, he also totally avoided the subject of human spirituality. He would acknowledge that there is more to the universe than the physical, but claimed that all religions were created by the elite to control us, and that all other forms of spirituality were “New Age”. Organized religion has certainly always been a control mechanism, and the New Age, with all of it’s cults, channeling rituals and “quantum physics means you create your own reality” mumbo-jumbo is not any better, but this is hardly a reason for a person not to seek spiritual enlightenment. I cannot say for certain that it was his intent, but the longer I listened to his show, the more I felt as if the show would likely draw one away from his own quest for the spiritual realm, pushing them instead towards a state of hopelessness. I fear that Alan could likely have this effect on anyone who put too much weight on the man’s projected impressions of the human experience.
It also appeared inconsistent that while supposedly encouraging people to be “free thinkers” and “individuals”, he would simply not allow anyone to disagree with him, even if they attempted to do so politely. If a caller phoned into his show presenting a view of the world variant from his own, he was simply told he was wrong, if not lambasted and cut-off. It was basically, “you are free to think whatever I tell you to think”.
I also always had the strange feeling that he was using some type of hypnotic technique, such as NLP, with the tone of his voice and the arrangement of his words. Though I could not ever really put my finger on it, I found the idea troubling.
“Your Love Won’t Pay My Bills”
By far the most contemptible aspect of his persona was his obsession with the copyright of his books. He would regularly launch into long rants about how people were giving away his .pdf files, playing the victim, crying about how hard his life is and how he has no money. On one show I can recall, he said 4 times that he could not afford an iPod. He would also beg shamelessly for donations, and use intense guilt tactics on anyone who was listening without paying their dues.
Why, I wondered, should a person claiming to be against the system of money be so obsessed with it? And why was he the only person in this movement not offering all of his material for free? His answer to the latter question was of course that everyone but him is a government funded propagandist.
I understand that we live in this system, and everyone needs money, but things are tough all over. I work 50 hours a week in a warehouse, and still cannot afford my own domicile. I spend whatever free time I have trying to aid the fight. Alan’s excuse for why he could not bring in some sort of income, like all of the rest of us do, outside of his work doing a one hour radio show three times a week, was absolutely ludicrous. He claimed it took all day to cook his meals and after doing the show from 7:00-8:00 pm, it took him until 3:00 am to upload the .mp3 file to his website. More recently he has said that he spends his entire day scouring the Internet for people who are violating his copyright.
Though this and several other doubts lingered in my mind, I was able to push it aside, as the information he was presenting was just so compelling.
“Keep This to Yourself, There are Spies Everywhere”
My first major clue as to Alan’s true nature came about 8 months ago when Alan stated several times that we should not talk to the people around us, because there are spies everywhere and we will be put in prison. This is totally ridiculous on a multitude of different levels. Yes, there may be “agents” who hang out in public places listening to people’s conversations; I doubt they are “everywhere”, as Alan claims, but for the sake of argument, let’s suppose they are. How would speaking in public make any difference at all? They already monitor everyone’s web usage, and have made lists of anyone who researches these subjects. We have nothing to lose anyway, as if we don’t stop this now, all of our lives are going to be a living hell, and most of us will probably end up dead.
There is absolutely no reason why we should not all be trying to wake up as many people as we possibly can before this thing comes down in full. Alex Jones even confronted him about this when Alan was a guest on his show, and Alan’s response was something like “people should not speak to others in their own area, but go to a different town where people don’t know who you are and talk to people there”. Whatever that means.
Upon hearing this, it hit me hard that Alan Watt was playing on paranoia in order to discourage truth seekers from exercising the one freedom we have left to do the one thing that may be able to save us; he was telling us not to attempt to wake others up.
Then the threats began.
“I’ll Make You Regret This”
The first threat against a member of my forum came in the Fall of 2008, after a forum poster going by the handle “Neo” created a site called “sentientsentinel.com”, in homage to Alan Watt, who’s European site is at “alanwattsentientsentinel.eu”. I told Neo that this was probably not a great idea, as the domain name was too similar to Watt’s. To make sure that readers would not get confused into thinking that this site was an official site of Alan Watt, he put a statement across of the top of the page stating that fact.
On October 1st, Alan became aware of the webpage. Instead of contacting the admin of the site and voicing his concerns, as any mature adult would be prone to do, he opted instead to go on the air on his RBN broadcast attacking and threatening the site (.mp3 link here, the threats are at 1:30 – 4:00, then from 5:50 – 8:00). He first claimed that it was created by government agents pretending to be him, to try and trick people and “lead them into forums”. He mixed his attacks on Neo with attacks on people who are supposedly violating his copyright, saying that he has “friends all over”, and would be “sending people to see [the people who have 'done the dirty' on him] and make them regret it”.
This seems to have clearly been a thinly veiled threat of violence. One member of Outlaw Forum, who is an obsessive follower of Watt, said that this in no way implied violence, but he was unable to come up with any example of a possible alternate meaning. “Sending people to see you” is generally understood as a classic mafioso style threat of physical harm, and I find it impossible to believe Watt doesn’t know this.
A couple days later, again talking both about “the one pretending to be him”, along with unknown individuals who he claims are distributing .pdf files of his copyrighted material, he reiterated the threat of harassment by his “friends” who are “all over the world”, saying “I will come down hard on you” (.mp3 link here, with the relevant statements at 1:50 – 5:00; transcript here). On the 6th of October he again attacks Neo’s site, and refering to the link on that site to outlawjournalism.com, he says that the site is steering people into “antisemitism” (.mp3 link is here, attacks are at 1:40 – 3:40; transcript here). Also worthy of note, the week before, when talking about the violators of his copyright, he said he had satellite pictures of a man named Alphonso’s home in Toledo, Ohio and that he better take the .pdf files down and send him money, or suffer some consequence (.mp3 link here, the threats are at 1:30 – 2:20).
The kicker is that he was implying that these people are government agents out to destroy him, and then threatening them. This is blatant double-speak. If they are government agents, why would he be threatening them?
You can make of this what you wish. It is within the realm of possibility that these “friends” he spoke of would do something other than beat up the accused, threaten their children, rape their wives, vandalize or burn down their homes, etc., though these are the images that immediately came to my mind upon hearing the threat. It is almost certain that whatever it is he was implying, these threats were a bluff, intended to intimidate the supposed offenders. If he was actually planning on sending thugs to someone’s house, he would not say it over the air. Alan is many things, but he is not stupid.
Whatever his intent was, I think it would be extremely difficult to argue that administering any manner of threat like this over the air to anyone, let alone to a fan of yours who you have not even attempted to contact privately, is the behavior of a normal, decent human being. These actions are more akin to the that of a deranged control freak who, unable to deal with his own frustration, launches into childlike tantrums whenever someone does something he doesn’t like. It is certainly not the behavior of a saint who would exile himself into obscurity, simply for the sake of trying to save humanity.
It was incredibly disillusioning to hear these threats from a man I had held in such high regard. Eventually, I swallowed my pride and admitted to myself that I had been duped. Alan was not the person of integrity that I had believed he was. Though he was presenting a different level of information than the rest of the “leaders”, he was in fact more disreputable than even the most shameless of the entire rouge’s gallery of profiteering conmen operating in this business.
The pieces began to fit into place in my mind. I realized he was not only not a hero, but in fact someone who likely had a diabolical agenda to push. Though I voiced my concerns about his threats on my forum, I did not state outright my rapidly intensifying suspicions about his real motives. I still held onto the hope that maybe he was just a frustrated old man who didn’t have a full understanding of the nature of the Internet, and I didn’t want to go public with my suspicions until I knew for sure.
Things only got worse.
“My Face is Copyrighted”
The next incident came when another of Alan’s listeners, a regular poster at Outlaw Forum who goes by the handle “ColossusOfDestiny”, created a domain called “alanwattfans.com”. On this site he had links to Alan’s podcasts, and was selling t-shirts and coffee mugs with Alan’s face on them. He stated that he would be donating a portion of the proceeds of the sales to Alan Watt.
When he posted the link on the forum, I and the rest of the regular posters told him that this was a terrible idea, and that he could expect to be threatened on air. No more than 18 hours later, Alan went on his show and threatened to sue the creator of this site, claiming that his face was copyrighted (.mp3 is here, with the relevant statements and threats at 2:00 – 16:00). He again tied this in with the real or unreal people he claims are distributing his .pdf files. He claimed that one of the people who was distributing his copyrighted files was in trouble with the police, and the rest would soon be joining him. All of the nonsense he goes on about is presented in this particular self righteous, self-pitying rant, and one can clearly see the disgust he has for his own listeners. He also mentions Outlaw Forum, calling us psychopaths, and compares us to the Rothschilds and the Freemasons.
He once again called the person who created the site a government agent trying to destroy him, before threatening him.
I want to make it clear that selling the t-shirts and coffee mugs was a horrible idea, and I am not defending this. The fact is that it would be plain to anyone who came across that site that this was just a young guy, who was inspired by Alan’s message, and was doing the best he could to spread the word.
Again, I know the man who made the site, and I know that just as with Neo, he would have taken it down immediately if Alan had simply emailed him and let him know he was uncomfortable with it. There was absolutely no reason, and no excuse, for more threats. It is the behavior of a spoiled child.
The fact that he responded so quickly was proof that he was now a regular lurker on Outlaw Forum. He was no doubt aware of the poor reception his “people are coming to get you” threats had received, and this time instead chose to threaten a lawsuit. The lawsuit was of course a bluff, just as the apparent threats of violence were. If Alan does not have the money to fix his broken chainsaw, as he has claimed, he certainly doesn’t have the tens of thousands of dollars it would take to launch an international Internet copyright infringement lawsuit.
At this point suspicions were mounting, not only on Outlaw Forum, but across the board. The events that followed caused all former followers of Watt who I have had contact with, save one religious devotee, to lose any remaining faith.
“Yes, I met Glen Kealey Once, Back in the 90′s”
The final proverbial nail in Watt’s coffin was quite fittingly bizarre in the extreme. On December 15th, “Warren in North Carolina” called into Watt’s show and asked if he knew a man named Glen Kealey. Watt said he did, that he had met him in the 90′s. The caller then told Watt that his material was clearly ripped off of Kealey’s work, and was promptly cut off. When Alan posted the podcast of the show on his website, he removed the caller who had called in questioning him (here is the show in full from the RBN archives, call at 49:50, and here is the redacted version from Watt’s site). Clearly, he did not want folks knowing about this Kealey person.
A member of Outlaw Forum noticed this strangeness, and we found Kealey’s sites (here, here, and here) and email group. Lo and behold, it seems that the majority of Watt’s “esoteric” knowledge has been directly lifted from this man’s work. All of “Watt’s” theories about the phonetic coding of language, the historical existence of genetic engineering, the hermaphroditic agenda, the troglodytes, etc., were directly taken from Kealey, without ever mentioning the man’s name.
What’s more, entire pages in Watt’s heavily copyrighted .pdf files appear to have been photocopied strait from The Kealey Paper. Images and entire pages of text are identical. In case you are wondering, the copyright on Kealey’s work is much older than the one on Watt’s. I am certain that Alan would have declared to the caller that Kealey ripped him off, as he claims that David Icke did, if there was any way he could make that seem plausible.
I do not yet have copies of The Kealey Papers, but I would not be surprised if the entirety of Watt’s three books was copied directly from them. One can go onto Kealey’s webpage and see images from the covers of the Papers which Watt has used in his books (example at the head of this article), and if you read through some of Kealey’s web posts, you can see clearly that Watt plagiarized his material extensively, giving him absolutely no credit. He even deleted the man’s name from his show, denying him as Peter denied Christ.
At this point, after all of the shattered trust and broken pride, there was nothing else I could do but laugh. I laughed long and hard. The “copyrighted files”, which I had spent hours listening to Watt cry his eyes out about, were in fact largely the work of someone else.
We discussed this extensively in a thread on Outlaw Forum. No one could deny it. It was just too blatant what Watt had done. We all knew what was coming next.
“They are Going to Kill Me and My Dog”
The Next round of threats came quickly, clearly in response to our discussion of Kealey. Here is the transcript of Watt’s statements about the Outlaw Forum, made after he discovered that we were discussing his plagiarism (.mp3 link here, statements are at 5:10 – 8:20):
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we are cutting through the matrix, and I have been discussing how we have all been brainwashed. The general technique of brainwashing means that the people who have been subjected to it never know it. That is why it is very successful. And we live in a scientifically indoctrinated age. An age where literally the sciences were developed to do with groups and they talk about neuroscience which goes right into genetics by the way, and eugenics, and how we have all been studied; the studies are ongoing. Most of the studies today on people and the groups they will join are done on chatrooms. Many people in the chat rooms don’t know they’re part of the experiments. And they break them down into dyads, subtypes, personality types, and so on, and that’s why it’s so easy for someone who is put in as an agitator to get the mob going against someone else.
These are experiments, and I’ve had a few of these experiments pulled on me, over the years. Always from the same group, from one particular forum. I know every single one of them, and so do the police. Because lately I’ve had threats come from the same group again. This group even had the gall to put up a fake website with my name on it, at one point. And you turn to the first page, the first link took you off to someone, I know his real name, called Andrew, and it was an anti-Semitic rant. So that one was tried on me before.
And now the same character has got the mob all geared up to try and harass me. So I have to warn you, every single one of you, on the website: it is being monitored by the cops. Because you see malicious intent, and threats, are taken seriously. And I take threats against myself and my life and my dog very seriously. So let that be a warning to all of you, in your own states of locked up paranoia.
Now I hate to even go off in that direction but that is what you get when you start to get known. If you are not saying the things they want you to say, or you are not agreeing with their particular spin on something they’ll come after you. That’s the mob. And most of them are just that as I say: they are the mob. They don’t think. And they are easily riled up by someone who knows the techniques. For they are the fronts, they are disposable at the end of the day.
Following his strange method once more, he first claimed that I was some type of agent running some kind of social experiment with my forum, using psychological manipulation methods to rile people up against him, before introducing his most nonsensical threat thus far.
In an attempt to switch the game up, he claims that we are the ones making the threats, citing this as the reason for his threats against us. This is called “blaming the victim”. He says members of Outlaw Forum are threatening to kill him and his dog. He just makes that up, out of nowhere. He says he has contacted the police, and that he knows who everyone on the forum is, and we are all going to be dealt with by the authorities because we are making death threats.
He says that these threats are “coming from members of the forum”. I guess rather than saying that we are making threats on the forum, which would be easily disproved by anyone who cared to take a look, he is implying that members of the forum are contacting him privately, identifying themselves as being members of the forum, and then threatening to kill him and his dog. That is what he is saying. Imagine it: “I am a poster at Outlaw Forum and I am going to kill you and your dog”.
Let’s just suppose that it did happen, exactly like that; someone wrote him an email, identified himself as a member of my forum and then threatened to kill him and his dog. What does this have to do with me or my forum? Why would he not simply forward the email to the proper authorities, and allow them to trace it, and deal with the criminal individual accordingly? Why would there be a need to mention it publicly?
Suppose they had sent him an email saying “I have a membership at the YMCA and I am going to kill you and your dog”; would he then call the cops and insist that they monitor everyone holding a membership at the YMCA, and would the cops go along with this, and spy on all of them, as he is claiming they are doing to the members of Outlaw Forum?
But he certainly couldn’t have actually called the cops and said we were making death threats, without any proof, could he? And which “cops” would he call, I wonder, given that we are all living in different states and countries? Would he call all of our local police departments, since he knows who we all are? Maybe he would contact Homeland Security and Interpol? Or possibly the United Nations and NATO?
Or maybe, just maybe, this is another desperate attempt at intimidation from a psychopathic control freak about to totally lose control, physically overwhelmed by the idea that someone can question his lies, and he be able to do absolutely nothing to stop it.
The key here is that he is trying to make people afraid to visit the forum by saying that they will be in trouble with the police if they do. This is a truly pathetic act of total desperation. Every listener to Alan Watt should be deeply offended that this man believes you are stupid enough to believe this craziness he is selling you.
He says “I know his real name, it’s Andrew”, and Andrew is the name on my birth certificate (though I was only ever called it on the first day of school). His having gathered this “personal” information on me is also clearly meant to intimidate, and prove that he has the ability to find out everything about us, and “make us pay”. However, this is not terribly difficult to figure out, and certainly does not prove he has some magical ability to go to a forum and find the personal information of everyone posting there, as he is claiming. I have to say though, the man is creepy. He does have that going for him.
It is also worthy of note that he slanders me with the label of “anti-semite”, referring to an article I wrote as an “anti-semitic rant”. That article is here, for those interested. Apparently, he believes that “anti-semitism” is a real concept, and that anyone who questions the Jewish religion or the Secular State of Israel should be labeled as such.
He calls me a ringleader of a band of brainwashed followers, riling people up to “harass” him. He is apparently implying to his listeners that this is somehow related to the supposed threats against him and his dog, but what he is actually talking about is me having encouraged people to call in to his show and ask him about Kealey. Ever since I made this suggestion on my forum, he has done shows without taking any calls, something I am not aware of him ever having done before. He has claimed that this is due to some technical problem, but one has to wonder how long he can keep that excuse going. He is going to have to deal with this situation in some way, and it will be interesting to see what he chooses to do.
He is backed up against a wall, because Kealey’s site is there for everyone to see, and once a person has seen it, they are not going to really be able to trust Watt ever again, especially given the measures he has taken to cover this whole thing up. It seems he is either going to have to go off the air, as he has been bluffing that he was going to in an attempt to increase his donations, or he is going to have to somehow attempt to address the issue of the plagiarism, by either admitting he was “influenced” by Kealey, or coming up with some sort of cover story, which could involve an elaborate fantasy tale about how Kealey is somehow working for the government as a part of some sort of complex plot to try and destroy him.
Whichever path he chooses, I assure you, these threats are going to keep on coming. Given the fact that he is clearly dredging the depths of total desperation, he may actually try to have me harassed in some way, and is almost certainly already trying to get my site shut down. If my site does happen to go down, or if I turn up missing (I seriously doubt the latter will occur, but given the apparent nature of this man, I have to at least mention the possibility), you will all know what has taken place.
After all of this, there is absolutely no way a person could honestly claim that Alan Watt is simply in this fight to try and help people. His behavior demonstrates that he has a severe personality disorder, which most assuredly prevents him from caring about anything other than himself.
Psychopathy is the only explanation for his behavior, as it would have been most beneficial for him to simply ignore Outlaw Forum altogether. He was unable to do so, due to his ego and the overwhelming need a psychopath has to control everything around him. If he had never begun with the threats, I and the rest of his now former listeners would likely still have respect for him, he would still be able to spread his defeatist message without being questioned, still be able to make a killing off of paypal donations.
He blew the scam himself by being unable to control his own psychopathic instincts. People were able to break away from him and see him for what he truly was, overcoming his lies, only because he was incapable of restraining his own evil nature. I believe that this is analogous of the situation the entire world finds itself in. Eventually, the very nature of the system in which we live will be it’s downfall.
We will never know for sure if Alan is some type of government propagandist, giving out extremely large doses of truth tainted with disinformation, confusion and paralyzing hopelessness, or simply a snake oil salesman, making easy money exploiting the vulnerability of people looking for truth in a world of lies. If he is the former, it seems that he is required by his controllers to earn his own keep while working this scam, in order that his ties to the establishment cannot be directly traced. This would explain his obsession with money and copyrights.
I want to state clearly that I have no definitive evidence that Alan is working for anyone, but I personally believe that it is the only logical explanation one could come to given his behavior. If he was simply out for money, he is intelligent enough he could be making a lot more in a lot of different ways.
***
I hope that this account helps those fans of Alan Watt, many of which were probably confused by his recent behavior, to put things together, and begin to snap out of the haze he has lolled you into. We will each have to break the spell that the “leaders” of this movement have cast on us if we wish stand a real chance at changing the future. We simply cannot afford to let ourselves be diverted by men with agendas that we do not even fully understand. Alan Watt is the final gatekeeper. If we can steer past him, we are in the clear, capable of deciding our own path.
Watt wants us to feel impotent and helpless. The people in power are not infallible, and they are not gods. We, those of us with the intelligence to figure this system out, and the willpower to oppose it, are the most powerful force on the planet. Our biggest threat is not the global banking cartel or the United Nations, but the shill “leaders” in our movement who serve to neutralize us. Free of the psychological and emotional chains they impose upon us, we are unstoppable. God is on our side, and it is we who shall inherit the Earth.
We must tell ourselves everyday that all is not lost. We must cling to the humanity we still have left, and the hope for a world where people can just be people. Yes, civilization is evil, but we are here for a reason, and that is what we should all be searching for. We each have the ability to change the world, simply by the choices we make. The future is still wide open. We are spiritual beings experiencing a physical form, and the battle of the spirit is still one that each of us can win, and together, we can still save the world.
Stay Free
–Andre
——————-
This article is not copyrighted, and Andre will not threaten you with violence, lawsuits, or police harassment if you redistribute it. In fact, he encourages you to do so, especially due to the fact that Alan Watt is going to do everything he can to silence him for putting out this information, and it needs to be widely available all over the web, given the outside chance that he may succeed. Andre would like to thank Justin for his help in putting this together.
***
Update, January 13: Glen Kealey is asked about Alan Watt’s use of his material.
Caller: I can hear by the way you talk, obviously it sounds like Alan Watt really did rip you off?
Kealey: Alan Watt called me for weeks on end to pick my brain, Alan Watt bought a newspaper subscription, read it, and copied material from it. He never, I am told, gave me any credit for having been the originator of all the ideas; however that doesn’t matter to me, I’m not in this for money. He might be in this for money.
.Mp3 is here.
There you have it. Straight from the horse’s mouth. This should remove any doubt that may be lingering in anyone’s mind about what is going on here. Alan Watt is a plagiarist, pure and simple, and the only reason he is not in a legal battle over this is that Kealey is apparently too nice of a guy.
Watt was doing the exact thing that he claimed other did to him. He was making a living off of another person’s work.
This is a very sad thing for many people who put their trust in Alan. I regret that I had to be the one to present this information, but I simply could not remain silent about this.
Goodbye Alan. It was fun while it lasted.
Here are a couple recent youtube clips I ran across where our good friend Henry Kissinger is unabashedly promoting a “New World Order”. They are fully aware of the negative connotations associated with this terminology, so the fact that they have begun using it so openly signifies that they are now so close to completing their objective that rather than attempt to hide it from the public any longer, they are simply saying “this is what is going to happen, it is time for you to come to terms with it”.
You will note that in both clips, Kissinger praises President Elect Obama, stating that he will continue George Bush’s mission of creating a New World Order.
In the first clip, recorded at a celebration of the 30th anniversary of the United State’s “special relationship” with China of all places, Kissinger is asked about the Gaza conflict. He responds with the usual “Israel has a right to defend herself” nonsense, and then says that Obama will use the state of global crisis to create a New World Order; “Ordo ab Chao”.
Kissinger calls on Obama to create a New World Order
In the second clip, Kissinger spends 7 minutes explaining why we need a New World Order. Of course, all of the reasons he lists are problems caused by the men he works for.
Here is an excellent documentary film made by my friend Franz, covering the subject of transhumanism. It is a very bizarre future that they have planned for us, but the documentation of this agenda is there for anyone to see. This video covers a large part of that documentation, and presents things in terms simple enough for anyone to grasp. Spread it around.
As many of you are aware, there is a concerted agenda by the powers that be to stop the “lesser beings” from reproducing. One way this agenda is being worked toward is by appealing to the promiscuousness of females, a cultural phenomenon that was itself was promoted by this same elite.
There is now a new procedure being promoted that can sterilize women in 90 seconds.
