Ohio poll workers indicted for fudging 2004 recount

Homeland Stupidity / January 11, 2007
Three Cuyahoga County, Ohio, election workers have been indicted on charges that they improperly conducted the recount of ballots after the 2004 election.
The special prosecutor in the case, Kevin Baxter, said that there was no evidence of vote fraud, but that the workers were trying to avoid having to conduct a public hand recount of the county’s ballots.

The Ohio recount process involves recounting three percent of the ballots by hand and by machine, and if the counts match, then recounting the remainder of the ballots by machine. But if the counts don’t match exactly after two attempts, then every ballot in the county must be recounted by hand.

The investigation began after a Toledo attorney wrote the Cuyahoga County prosecutor with allegations that the election officials had not selected precincts at random and had pre-counted the ballots, choosing only precincts where the hand counts matched the machine counts, and then pretending to choose those precincts at random when the recount was done. The prosecutor recused himself, and Baxter, a prosecutor from Erie County, was appointed special prosecutor.

Kathleen Dreamer was manager of the board’s ballot department. Rosie Grier was assistant manager. Jacqueline Maiden was Elections Division director and its third-highest-ranking employee. All have been charged with misdemeanor and felony counts of failing to follow the state elections law.

A May 8 trial date is set for Dreamer and Grier, but Baxter wants to combine all three cases, including Maiden’s, who was indicted later. . . .

“They screwed with the process and increased the probability, if not the certainty, that there would not be a full countywide hand count,” Baxter said. — Cleveland Plain Dealer

Michael Vu, executive director of the Cuyahoga County elections board, said that the employees had been following established procedures, had done nothing wrong, and were actually prepared to hand count the entire county’s ballots.

“Why do all that work to prepare for the election, conduct it, audit it, canvass and then not meet this last obligation?” he said. “Our plan was to regroup after Christmas and just work through it.”

The recount of Ohio had been requested by the Libertarian and Green Party presidential candidates, Michael Badnarik and David Cobb.

Discuss it on the Outlaw Forums

One Response to “Ohio poll workers indicted for fudging 2004 recount”

  1. anonymous Says:

    Here is the real problem in Ohio, Kerry votes counted for Bush. And it was a pre-mediitated crime given this evidence:

    OHIO 2004: 6.15% Kerry-Bush vote-switch found in probability study

    Defining the vote outcome probabilities of wrong-precinct voting has revealed, in a sample of 166,953 votes (1/34th of the Ohio vote), the Kerry-Bush margin changes 6.15% when the population is sorted by probable outcomes of wrong-precinct voting.

    The Kerry to Bush 6.15% vote-switch differential is seen when the large sample is sorted by probability a Kerry wrong-precinct vote counts for Bush. When the same large voter sample is sorted by the probability Kerry votes count for third-party candidates, Kerry votes are instead equal in both subsets.

    Read the revised article with graphs of new findings:

    The 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis
    How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes

    http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html

    A PowerPoint too:

    http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt

    From the conclusions:
    Given the number of switched-votes in Cuyahoga County, results in other Ohio counties and elections should also be analyzed for irregularities wherever more than one ballot order was employed at a voting location. The same needs to be accomplished for past Ohio elections.

Leave a Reply